Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Book Review: I, Robot by Isaac Asimov

Guest Blogger Week continues with another SF/F book review. Enjoy!



I, Robot by Isaac Asimov
Science Fiction, 256 pages
2008, Spectra

(Aside: There are several versions of this book available from several different publishers. The cover art and publishing information you see here is from the most recent version.)

Review by Emily White

I, Robot, by Isaac Asimov is about, well, robots. And if you’ve seen the 2004 Will Smith movie, you might be led to believe that the two shared some similarities. Let me correct those assumptions right now.

The book is, essentially, a compilation of stories given by Dr. Susan Calvin to a reporter in which she relates the history of robotic development, from the very simplest non-talking robot to the Machines that have full reign over the world.

Dr. Lanning, while present in the book, did not fall to his death in order to warn the world about the impending robot invasion. And there was no lamenting Detective Spooner to say “I told you so.”

In fact, there was no real connectivity between the stories in I, Robot at all. Each story introduced a different robot and often, a different set of characters. While Dr. Calvin was the narrator, she was rarely present in the accounts she was relating--a good thing, in fact, considering she was a rather flat character. There was one instance where the reader was finally able to relate to her, but it was cut short and never spoken of again.

Individually, the stories were rather good. Asimov is capable of building just the right amount of tension to make the reader start playing the guessing game. However, as a whole, the book was so-so. The premise was clear: the robots were getting smarter, and with each advancement, a new set of problems would arise. By the time the reader gets to the last few pages, we are led to believe that something truly terrifying is happening. However, the blasé attitude Dr. Calvin portrays takes away from the effect. In fact, her total infatuation with the robots leads you to believe that the fate of humanity in the hands of the Machines is not such a bad thing after all.

Would I recommend this book? If you are brand new to sci-fi, yes. It’s straightforward and carries the reader along at an easy pace without overwhelming him/her with new terms. However, if science fiction is your niche, I’d say skip this one and read one of Isaac Asimov’s many other novels. Sadly, this is one of the few instances where the movie outshined the book.

-----
Emily White has been writing science fiction and fantasy seriously for six years. During this time, she has completed five short stories and one novel, with her second, Aurumenas, nearing completion. Visit her blog, Stepping Into Fantasy, where she discusses writing and topics related to the genre of science fiction & fantasy.

Monday, September 28, 2009

Book Review: Dragon Slippers by Jessica Day George

Welcome to Guest Blogger Week! This week's theme is SF/F Book Reviews. Enjoy!



Dragon Slippers by Jessica Day George
Young Adult Fantasy, 336 pages
2007, Bloomsbury USA Children's Books

Review by Jaleh Dragich

I've had a love of dragons for as long as I can remember. That love has led me to authors I'd never heard of before finding their book featuring dragons. For example, the first Piers Anthony book I'd ever read was Dragon on a Pedestal. That opened me up to the entire Xanth setting, becoming another of the many places I wish I could visit. That book then led me to other books he's written, just because he'd snagged me with the dragon. I discovered Jack Prelutsky, children's poet, from his book of poetry The Dragons Are Singing Tonight, also featuring some lovely artwork by Peter Sis. And the Pit Dragon Trilogy led me to more books by master storyteller Jane Yolen. So, I've trained myself to be on the alert for other dragon-themed works that might hook me into new additions to my favorite author list.

I discovered Dragon Slippers in a dollar store a couple months ago. The title snagged my attention; the jacket blurb sold me the book. Dragons, embroidery, and a promise to be an atypical fairy tale. Having grown up on The Ordinary Princess, I knew I couldn't leave the book behind. It came home with me. Once I started reading, I couldn't put it down. Though written for young readers, the plot had enough complexity to keep me guessing how it would resolve.

When Creel is sent to the dragon's lair in the hopes that a wealthy knight would rescue then marry her, therefore, improving the fortunes of her family, she never expected the vast differences between tales and reality. For example, this dragon did not have mounds of golden treasures, but a vast array of shoes. Each dragon had their own unique collection. Gold was of little interest, at least to Theoradus.

After bargaining with the cranky dragon, Creel sets off for the king's city with a small supply of embroidery thread left to her from her mother and a strange pair of azure leather slippers from the dragon's hoard. Perhaps there she could find work with her skill in embroidery, enough that she could eventually open her own shop.

But the path to her dreams is filled with obstacles and potholes. She is attacked by bandits and rescued by Shadras, yet another dragon. His collection consists of high quality stained glass windows, providing a source of new embroidery designs. When she finally arrives at the city, she is treated with disdain and runs into trouble with a foreign princess, the bride-to-be of the Crown Prince. What is with the hostility in this town? She can't even get directions to the cloth-workers district.

Nearly taken to jail for breaking a curfew she hadn't known about, she is rescued by Prince Luka, brother to the Crown Prince, who had already heard about the earlier incident and found it amusing. He takes her to his old nanny who now runs an inn. She agrees to let Creel stay the night and to help her find a job in the morning.

Even with employment, questions and difficulties still confound her. Why does Prince Luka continue to seek her out, even buying her gifts? Can she get a dress ready in time to attend the Merchant's Ball, suitable for attracting a wealthy patron? And why does the foreign princess keep demanding Creel's shoes?

The fate of a kingdom is on the farmgirl's feet. Too bad the dragons hadn't trusted her with their secret.

This first person tale of an ordinary girl who stumbles into kingdom-changing events shows what can happen when you remain true to yourself and to your friends. Whatever store you can find this in, it is well worth the price.

And yes, Jessica Day George has been added to my favorite authors list. Time to go find more books from this talented author. Hmm. Her website could help with that: www.JessicaDayGeorge.com. Oh look, two more books with Creel, Prince Luka, and their friends. I know what I plan to buy soon.

-----

Jaleh Dragich is an avid reader and aspiring author of fantasy and science fiction. Her interest in the genre covers more than the written form to include music, movies, games, and visual art. She is now sharing her passion for the subject on her blog, Ex Libris Draconis.

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Saturday Science: Meteorology


The study of weather patterns and climate is called meteorology. The technical name for the weatherman on your local news station is a meteorologist. So what is the term used for the study of meteors? Um...that would also be meteorology. The word meteor was first coined in the 1500's by the Greeks, and the literal translation is "a thing in the air." So, by that definition, meteorology is correct, even though we now know that meteors, although they streak through the sky, originate from beyond our Earth's atmosphere.

One aspect of meteorology that always fascinated me is the Water Cycle. That image above looks like something out of a 4th grade textbook, which was about the time I started to really take an interest in science. It makes you feel all smart and stuff when you know what words like evapotranspiration mean (and, as much of a nerd as I am, I still openly admit that I am a complete ditz sometimes regarding common sense type things). But, aside from that, studying the Water Cycle helps one to realize just how unique our planet is. Without this perfect balance, life wouldn't exist here.

Have a great weekend!

~Lydia

Friday, September 25, 2009

The (Not So) Perfect Protagonist


As fiction writers, we live in a fantasy world. Everything is perfect in fantasies, right? That's okay if said fantasy never leaves your head, but if you want to write a compelling story that readers can connect with, you'd better bang some dents in your characters' cake pans.

Yesterday, literary agent Rachelle Gardner posted about the difference between a PROactive main character and a REactive one. All characters will react, in one way or another, to what happens to them. However, a good protagonist (and a good ANtagonist, too, for that matter) will take it a step further and make things happen.

This isn't always what's best for the character, but it's perfect for the story, as Rachelle brought out with the example of Scarlett O'Hara. Aside from the fact that she's one of my all-time favorite female protagonists, she proves a good point. Miss O'Hara didn't always make good choices. In fact, most of the time, she was stubborn, selfish, whiny, irrational, and impulsive, among other things, and made situations worse by her actions. But, in her mind, she thought she was doing what was necessary to survive some very trying times in her life. Isn't that what all of us are doing from day to day? Thus, we can connect with her on a certain level, even though we want to smack some sense into her half of the time, and the other half of the time, we just want her to shut up and kiss Rhett. Either way, we're still hooked on her story.

It's been said that characters are plot, and a good plot is driven by proactive characters with seemingly more faults than strengths.

Not every story is about the characters' struggle to overcome their own weaknesses, though (the main plot, that is). Some are. Most aren't. A plot is made up of events, and a good protagonist puts those events in motion. On purpose. So how do you, as the writer, create that beautiful harmony?

1) Take your perfect protagonist and set him/her
on a cinder block.
2) Go to the shed and get a sledgehammer.
3) Bang the hell out of your character.
4) Repeat as necessary, or just for fun.

That's pretty much it … okay, I lied … there's more to it than that. Outer flaws (physical) affect the inner person: how they react emotionally. Inner flaws (personality) affect the outer person: how they react kinetically. A believable main character has a good mix of both. Notice I didn't say a balance of both, just a mix. Inner flaws should, in my opinion, outweigh the outer flaws, unless your story focus is specifically about how to deal with those physical issues.

Whatever happens to your protagonist will cause a reaction, but what he/she does next is what keeps the reader reading. Here's the simplest example I can think of:

Someone smacks your character across the face with or without being provoked. What does your character do? One of three things:

1) Turn the other cheek.
2) Cry and run away.
3) Smack right back, or worse.

All three of those reactions are very telling of character.

If your protagonist is crying and running away from things, that's pure reactive response, and they need to have a strong quality that overshadows their extreme weakness. Most readers don't care for this type of character. Myself included.

If he/she turns the other cheek, that can be seen as noble and/or respectable, depending on the context and events of the story. That is a proactive response, but, in my opinion, not the best choice. Your character appears self-righteous and, in a way, perfect.

Obviously, if your character is ready to go rounds with the offender, that is a proactive response. Personally, I like protagonists that choose the third route. First, why are they so quick to fight? That implies an inner flaw that many readers can connect with. Second, this impulsive type of reaction can lead to massive inner turmoil later, when they stop to think about what they've done. That, in turn, leads to another proactive decision about how they think they can fix things. And so on, and so forth.

Going back to the example of Scarlett O'Hara for a moment, how many times did she marry for money? How did that affect her actions and decisions later? How many times did she encounter death? She reacted differently to each scenario. How did that affect her actions and decisions later? The plot of Gone With the Wind doesn't have a leg to stand on without the proactive decisions and actions of Scarlett, even though, most of the time, she made bad choices.

Read that again: She made bad choices. See the point?

That wonderful imperfection is where a compelling story comes from. One thing leads to another, leads to another, leads to another. And at the heart of it all is your banged up protagonist, putting the events in motion, for better or for worse.

~Lydia

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Movie Review: X-Men Origins: Wolverine


Warning: This review is extremely biased. I grew up watching X-Men cartoons on Saturday mornings. My younger sister and I used to "play" X-Men. She'd be Rogue; I'd be Storm. And we both had a crush on Gambit (something about the accent).

When the first X-Men movie was released in 2000, I about crapped my pants. LOVED IT. Cheesy? Yes. Unrealistic at times? Definitely (hello! it's based on a comic book series). Awesome action? You bet. And that was the year the world was introduced to the amazing wonder commonly known as Hugh Jackman. Simply put, he made Wolverine a phenomenon. Those of us who were already familiar with the character knew the potential he had to overshadow all the other X-Men (and, on occasion, other comic book characters), but to see it happen on screen was just plain wicked. From that point on, Wolverine could do no wrong, no matter how bad the rest of the movie was around him.

Case in point, the third movie. Every film was better than the one that preceded it in terms of special effects, but the story? Myeh. Not so much. By number three, it seemed like a random collaboration of mutants all trying to somehow connect into a common thread, and it just didn't work. Angel's drop from a fifty-story building? Heart-pounding and graceful. Phoenix disintegrates Professor Xavier? Disturbing and tense. Magneto's displacement of the Golden Gate bridge? Unrealistic but still a cool concept. And Wolverine kicked ass here, here, here, and here. Instant blockbuster.

What was the story, though? Uh...regular people think the mutants are bad...mutants don't like being different but they also don't want to change...conflict of interest...let's fight. Wait, um, wasn't that the first and second movie, too?

Yep. And number four pretty much had the same idea. I can't even remember how many times I'd said to Joe while watching, "That was so predictable," or, "Saw that coming." Still a good movie, though. And here's why:

Wolverine kicks ass. I could justifiably stop right there, but I won't.

The opening credits weren't boring. They portrayed the history of Wolverine and Saber-Tooth as brothers, decades of working together. I thought this was an effective use of screen time and added to the emotional impact of later events.

Wolverine kicks ass again. A lot.

Deadpool's humor in his first scene (where he actually got to talk) surpassed all other dialogue in the movie.

Wolverine kicks ass again. And then he shows ass in one of the funniest parts of the movie...running naked across a field (fresh from his adamantium infusion) and then hiding in a barn while the old couple who own the place just sit and watch from their pickup. A naked man running will always get a laugh. And apparently earns you a leather jacket.

Gambit didn't have a big enough role in this movie, in my opinion, and his introduction was weak (I had high expectations, though, because he is one of my all-time favorite characters). But I did like the effects they did with his cards, lacing them with the red energy, or whatever it is that makes them explode. His staff, although he twirls it nice, wasn't so impressive.

More of Wolverine kicking ass made up for it. We also got to see Cyclops as a kid and (a very CG'd version of) young(er) Professor Xavier, which implied the beginnings of his school for mutants...er, gifted children.

The next X-Men Origins movie is already underway. I'm guessing the basic plot will be the same as the rest of them, but hopefully, the furry-faced claw-wielding bit of awesomeness will be showing up again to kick (and shred) more ass in the next one.

~Lydia

Monday, September 21, 2009

Reality Check: The Ugly Side of Writing

Some things I've learned and, in my ever-benevolent generosity, would like to pass on to you.

For anyone who doesn't know, being a writer is not easy. If you're considering writing as a career choice, or you know someone who is and you'd like to have a better understanding of their plight, please read this carefully.

Writing is not something you "do for fun in your spare time." It's hard work. Harder than most people realize. And you must make time to write, while holding down a so-called real job that pays the bills. This usually means getting little or no sleep on a regular basis. Drink lots of coffee/Mountain Dew/energizing beverage of your choice. Keep typing. Repeat.

You do not typically finish an article in an hour, a short story in a day, or a novel in a month. And you never get it perfect on the first try, no matter how good you are or how long you've been writing. Period. If you believe you are above editing, quit now.

On any given day you will feel one or more of the following: want to burn everything you've written, want to throw your laptop against the wall, want to bang your head on the keyboard (because whatever appears on the screen as a result would be better than the garbage you typed over the last two hours), want to move some place exotic and sell curios on the beach (odds are, you'd be more successful at that than being a writer, and you wouldn't have to sit in a room all by yourself, day in and day out, with nothing to show for it but a bad case of eyestrain and carpal tunnel syndrome).

You will always second-guess your creativity, talent, and skill. You will say bad reviews don't hurt while imaging the exact details of how you'll give the reviewer a slow and painful death.

Rejections come with the territory and they're not always padded with motivational phrases that give you reasons not to quit. If you do get one of those, save it. But usually, you receive a form letter with your name inserted at the top. Sometimes, the rejection is a bit more personalized, harsh enough to make a grown man cry (and probably has). It's not recommended to submit any piece of your work to any market, no matter how magnificent you feel it is, if you're not ready for someone to tear it limb from limb in every imaginable way.

If your significant other is a writer and you aren't, don't expect them to hear anything you say while they're in writing mode, even if they're looking right at you. Chances are, they're still perfecting words and sentences in their head, grumbling over deadlines, devising plots and scenarios, and arguing with their characters, all the while nodding and smiling like they're paying attention. This is a disease for which there is no cure.

If your spouse/significant other is a writer and you are, too, well . . . yeah, um . . . good luck.

Writing is not easy, and neither is being a writer. You must crave self-torture in order to succeed. This was in no way meant to be a discouragement. Along with the bad, there is a cornucopia of good, but only for those who persist despite the struggle.

~Lydia

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Saturday Science: Biology


Before I get started, just stare at that picture for a few minutes. How awesome is that? Gives me the shivers and the tingles all at once. Maybe I missed my calling as a marine biologist. Or a pirate. Whichever.

I've had a fascination with sharks, and especially, Great Whites, since I was very young. Kind of a fear/awe thing. One of my "bucket list" goals is to touch the nose of a Great White through the bars of a shark cage. Yep. You read that right. I don't want to just see one, I have to touch it. Perhaps I'll never touch anything with that hand again (because it was bitten off), but I think it'll be worth it. Maybe.

Anyway, this is Saturday Science, so enough about me. Here's an interesting fact about Great White sharks. That is, aside from their impressive aerial displays. (And regarding that, for just a moment, leaping out of the water is typical of sharks in the lamnidae family, more commonly known as mackerels.)

All sharks have an extra sense that enables them to detect the electromagnetic field emitted by the movement of living animals. The Great White has an extremely high level of sensitivity, able to detect as little as half a billionth of a volt. This, obviously, is a beneficial asset for effective hunting on the high seas. (Arrr, matey!)

Something even more amazing, though, is the Great White's ability to regulate its internal temperature as a way of ensuring a successful hunt. They may go weeks between meals, so when the opportunity arises for a quick snack, they better be up to it. All that swimming is good for the muscles, but if you haven't eaten in a while, your metabolism is pretty much nill.

The Great White was created with what we humans have termed a "rete mirabile", which is Latin for "wonderful net" (I'm pretty sure God just calls it "another one of my great ideas"). This close web-like structure of veins and arteries, located along each lateral side of the shark, conserves heat by warming the cooler arterial blood with the venous blood that has been warmed by the working muscles, keeping certain parts of the body (particularly the brain) at temperatures above the surrounding water, while the heart and gills remain at sea-temperature. The core body temperature then matches the shark's surroundings, and thus, conserves energy.

Great Whites are typically found in cooler sea climates, so the ability to keep the important parts of the body warm while, at the same time, conserving energy by dropping temperature in the non-essentials is vital. And also, for the record, quite mind-boggling when you think about it. The shark doesn't do any of this conscientiously. It just happens.

But it doesn't stop there. What goes down (in this case, core temperature), must come back up when the Great White's electrical sensors tell it there's a meal nearby. This is no problem for the shark. Again, it just happens, and the shark has plenty of energy reserves because of what I'd stated above.

And then you better watch out, cuz those suckers can swim pretty fast when they put their mind to it. Up to 35mph (or more) in a single burst. Which of course, explains how they're able to make flying leaps out of the water.

Final word. Great White shark = pure awesomeness. Take a look at that picture again and tell me I'm wrong.

~Lydia

Friday, September 18, 2009

Alien Creation 101: World Building

Today's post was written by guest blogger and speculative fiction novelist, Liz Penn (bio below). Thank you, Liz!

Previous posts about alien creation can be found here and here.

---

Now that you've created your multi-legged, three-eyed, sapphire alien, it's time to place him in a world. But how? A good speculative fiction story should and does include realistic characters, a well-written world, and an intriguing plot—in that order.

Enough with the surprised gasps. It is my opinion that world should actually come at the same time or even slightly before your plot. If your characters interact and work toward goals in a less than believable world, your readers will not buy-in to the plot. Much like your body, all the pieces of a story need to work seamlessly together.

Each and every author will likely world-build in a different way. Some write out detailed interactions, back history, and legends, none of which actually make it into the story, but perhaps help them to drop minor references and clues toward that vast framework. Others might simply have bits of their world come to them as they write with the characters. Whatever your way of world-building, there are certain steps you can take to make the job easier and to add that speck of realism.

Use layers as if you were creating a cake. In the real world, there are layers. Religion, culture, language, surroundings, family life, relationships, even the very ecosystem we live in, affect how we think and react.

The same holds true in a story. To make a strong, viable world, you need to create those layers, even if (like a multiple-layered cake) they may not be fully visible.

Do not beat your reader over the head with your wonderful story. Invoke or imply the concept of more than just what you're placing in words. For example, many science fiction stories mention near the beginning something about "two suns", or a "purple sky", or whatever. It's a brief description, so quick our eye might miss it, but our minds recognize that quiet signal. This is not set on Earth.

That's a layer. Later on, if you mention something about their "Overseer", you've now added a hint of another level. Political, and likely, dictatorship, or perhaps a group of elitists, but certainly not a democratic republic.

Mild references can etch the surface of those layers, allowing the reader to get an idea in their head of a world that exists, without info-dumping.

However, going back to our cake analogy, you cannot simply leap into the story and hope the layers work out on their own. You don't toss a hodge-podge of ingredients into a mixing bowl, throw them in a pan, and then expect everything to magically form into a tasty cake.

The same holds true for world-building. Before you can use those layers, you need to create them. The best thing to do, in my opinion, is to set aside some time at the end of your official writing time and work on this new world. Jot down notes. Read books dealing with the culture you're trying to emulate. Study pictures of similar environments. Sketch out possible creatures or buildings.

The easiest way I've found to world-build is to take my character and start questioning. Most speculative fiction writers ask what if when they get ready to work out a plot. When it comes to world-building, ask yourself why and how.

Why does your character wear this? Why does he speak like this? Why does he have three eyes, or four legs, or wings? How did his people end up this way? How did this legend begin?

If you don't have an answer already in mind, make one. That is where the fun in world-building comes from. For example, I was once scrounging through a thesaurus and stumbled across a word. Lacuna. The word is Latin for hole. It almost sounds like a place-name, doesn't it?

I took that word, said, "What if that was a planet", and then questioned, "Why would they name a planet simply—hole?"

Here's the basic thought process that created the world that is now a feature in my novels.

Maybe they orbit a black hole. Why? Because their sun went cold. How did they manage to orbit without being harmed? Perhaps they have advanced technology, and thus created an artificial hole. How did the radiation emitted, the loss of heat and sunlight, affect their culture? How would they adjust to the change and not lose their minds? Eugenics coupled with genetic engineering.

I'm going to stop there, but do you see how applying both why and how can lead you on a creative pattern? Ask yourself those questions over and over again.

World-building also spawns plot. When you ask yourself those questions, and begin creating characters and situations, it is easy to grasp ideas from the world you're creating.

After creating a world focused on eugenics and genetics to survive, and projecting how that would affect their culture, I threw in the what if question as well. Their almost fanatical treatment of genetics led me to think, "What if someone found a way to alter these Lacuna's genetic code? How would those who were altered be treated? How would they deal with the conflict in culture versus their own alteration?"

Another example would be my creation of the Guild and the loquiri factions in one of my fantasies. The Guild hates loquiri and strives to kill or kidnap as many as possible. The loquiri, though relatively peaceful, will fight back if they're threatened.

What if someone was born as a loquiri, but was grabbed by the Guild at a young age? Why would that matter? How would it change how he feels and acts?

The two factions are the "world", the culture that he lives in. But the world itself caused a plot line to develop.

World-building is essential to speculative fiction. It adds realism and helps readers become strongly invested in the storyline. And world-building can often spawn more plots and subplots. When creating a speculative fiction story, don't forget this all-important step.

---

Liz Penn has been a serious writer of science fiction and fantasy for 9 years. She has completed 4 novels (with more in progress), 7 short stories, and 50 poems (several of which have been published).

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

ART IMITATING ART BY WAY OF TUNING FORK UPSIDE THE HEAD

I could give all the stats about music. Music soothes, and also disquiets. Google it. I have been doing research for years on psychology and music, and you can now find it in 30 seconds. Beethoven helps children learn. Bach expands the spatial concepts and ability to concentrate. Soft music played by plants actually made them grow more lush; heavy music actually caused them to wither and die.

But like I said, you can Google all that. So I'll be going with a more personal approach. I will not get into bands I do and don't like, because I have very eclectic tastes from all genres of music, and I am strongly antagonistic toward those I don't like.

So we'll bypass all of that and conduct an experiment.

Get a tuning fork. If you don't have one, go to Guitar Center or Lentine's or something and pick one up. Go 'head, I'll wait.

Got one? Cool. Now tap it against your forehead. Yeah, your forehead. Is it reverberating through you? No? Do it harder. No, I mean harder. Really make that sucker ring.

Still no reverberation? Hmm. You must have gotten a small one. Here, I'll use mine. It's a 16 pounder.

*CLANG*

Nice. Can you get up please? Kind of rude to nap while someone is learnin ya something. Please focus.

Okay, what was the point of all that? First, those who know me know I do this all the time. I speak by way of meandering rant. But there's a bit of a point to my analogous reference. Other than the fact I like to smack people with tuning forks bigger than sledgehammers, music resonates within us more than any other art.

Music is the most potent art. I know that sounds funny coming from a writer, but when I played in a band, I was a writer and a musician. The lyrics I or my brothers wrote were driven home by the music. Our ultimate goal as a melodic hardcore band was not to play the hardest and fastest. We wanted melodies to fit the mood of the lyrics. We played soft. We played heavy. We won on a few.

I remember playing a song about my dad back when I was 19 or 20, and choking up going into the intro. Dad decided 31 years old was enough of a life and died, leaving me as his oldest son at twelve, and my ten and six year old brothers. Obviously, we had struggles because of it.

Both of my brothers were extremely talented, and my dark charisma was perfect for the front man role. None of us were fake, and that performance wasn't fake. This particular song had very soft verses and a heavy chorus.

The verse cut into the chorus. I sang my guts out. Josh played his fingers off. Caleb's drums sounded like they were coming from Mount Olympus. Even our bass player sounded better that night. The chemicals flooding through my brain were like nothing else--and as a Type I combination bipolar, I have some pretty interesting Molotov cocktails swishing around in there.

I looked out into the crowd, and amidst the kids rocking out in the spotty lighting were people who knew my dad. Grown men nearly my size silently crying. As we went back to the second verse, with the softer clean guitar, the crowd erupted. E-R-U-P-T-E-D. They stopped only when I began singing again. We were not a band. We were three brothers projecting life without Dad, left only with questions, throwing all of that into the crowd and making them feel it and owning every single one of them. I even had someone ask me for a copy of the lyrics after the show.

You do not get that from writing alone. Sure, I have written things that have made people cry. I got my beautiful wife to shed tears with a nonfiction short about threatening a bully in a Taco Bell, of all things. Momz lost it to a poem (also about Dad). But I didn't move people or make them feel the emotion like with music.

As writers, we take people places. We inspire, yes, and move, yes, and provide escape. But music is integral to that as well, for many of us. How many of us listen to music while writing?

On the Writer's Digest forum, it's common practice for the regulars on the SF/F forum to post the song they're listening to that correlates to the story or scene they're writing. I listen to everything, and people will actually ask me for a song for a particular character or scene or even mood. I am always able to come up with something.

Hehe. I just deleted about 300 words of music genre rants. Cliffs Notes: certain genres lend well to certain scenes. We listen to a lot of heavy stuff in our house, but also lots of orchestral. Judging by our Playlist below, my darling wife apparently found a hidden love of 80's rock, as well.

Genres can be misused, though. A fight scene is hard rock, right? Not necessarily. I use music differently.

The hard stuff is used for narrative or bits that have to be plowed through to get to the action or plot twists or other conflict. It inspires a bit.

I use orchestral to alleviate writer's block and help me connect thoughts.

Even I, who have come up with some of the most reprehensible comments of self-deprecation, admit I do the fight or battle scenes very well. I listen to love songs for fight scenes.

Yep, love songs. Why? Because nearly all of my protagonists are protective. Ballads inspire to protect loved ones. Many of my antagonists are also vengeful, so I find the fight scenes are extra passionate (read: brutal) if the thought of losing a loved one is forefront in the mind.

I listened to the mushy stuff when I wrote the climactic battle scenes for Lydia's Web of Deceit, and everyone that reads them is impressed.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have to use the restroom. For that, I put on the Beatles.

know, I know, I said I wouldn't get into bands, but…yeah. I don't like the Beatles so much. I've been having this argument for the last few weeks, since the Beatles Rockband is coming out for XBOX 360.

They did not influence rock. They influenced pop. Chuck Berry, Dion and the Belmonts, Jerry Lee Lewis, Neil Diamond, Muddy Waters (and later, Buddy Guy and all the other Chicago Blues guitarists), and Elvis influenced rock.

The Beatles themselves were influenced by (and admittedly tried to keep up with melodically) the Beach Boys.

Okay, I'm done. I need to listen to something soothing now. Like Bach. Or Sevendust.

Monday, September 14, 2009

Movie Review: State of Play

This movie is actually a Mystery/Thriller, but since X-Men Origins: Wolverine won't be available on DVD until Tuesday, we had to compromise last night. And for the record, the movie was not our first choice. We wanted to rent Taken, but the intensity of violence noted in that one was a little too high with our son in viewing/hearing distance.

The concept of State of Play--a team of investigative reporters work alongside a police detective to try to solve the murder of a congressman's mistress--left a lot of room for creativity and unique subplots, but apparently, the screenwriters didn't see it that way. The plot was incredibly amateur, full of twists at the end that seemed to be thrown in just for the sake of being there, and the explanations fell terribly short of the mark of excellence.

My first thought was, "When did Russell Crowe get a double chin and a gut?" Not sure if he gained the weight for the role (it didn't seem necessary) or if he's just let himself go lately. That seems shallow of me to say, but you do notice when someone gains or loses weight, even close acquaintances. It didn't bother me once I got used to it. His character, Cal McAffrey, was well-acted. The only fault I found with Crowe was that he let his accent slip a few times.

Wish I could say the same for the supporting cast. Ben Affleck as congressman Stephen Collins was just . . . I can't even think of a word for it. Horrific. Yeah, that'll have to do. Aside from a few emotional outbursts, his dialogue was delivered so dryly I wanted to offer him a drink.

The only interesting thing about Robin Wright Penn's performance, as Collins' wife, was the argument that ensued between us as to whether or not she was, in fact, Robin Wright Penn who played Jenny (Forrest Gump) and Buttercup (The Princess Bride). She really didn't look like herself in this movie (check out this side by side photo ). Joe and his brother disagreed. I bet them a million dollars that it wasn't her, and I lost that bet when their mother pointed out her name in the closing credits.

Anyone have a spare million I can borrow?

Della Frye (played by Rachel McAdams) was somewhere in between mediocre and a-slug-race-is-more-exciting. I probably would have had a better impression if they hadn't introduced her character so awkwardly. She attempts to pry information from McAffrey for a blog post she's working on, when actually, they are both reporters for the same newspaper. What? Or maybe I misunderstood that part, since I was too busy laughing at Joe's "you can't trust bloggers cuz they all want to take over the world" jokes.

Anyway, enough about the bad acting, let's get to the thrilling plot. Oops. I forgot. There isn't one. Well, not one worth talking about. The movie starts out like any good mystery should, displaying a plethora of seemingly unrelated events that you have to believe will all be connected and wrapped up with a satisfying conclusion. Didn't happen. I was more confused at the end of the movie than I was at the beginning.

The best part? Watching the printing press whip out newspapers during the closing credits. We pretty much laughed and joked our way through the movie, just to keep our dignity. Even Joe's grandmother blurted something that had us all rolling for a few minutes. So I suppose it was entertaining, if you look at it that way.

~Lydia

Saturday, September 12, 2009

Saturday Science: Astronomy


Mankind has always been awestruck by the beauty magically revealed above them when the sun goes to sleep. And rightly so. This image of the summer night sky is brought to you by Astronomy Picture of the Day (click the link for more info on the image details, written by a professional astronomer; click the image for a closer view).

Have a great weekend!

~Lydia

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Kreativ Blogger Awards


Thanks to Jai Joshi for presenting us with a Kreativ Blogger Award!

Seven More Great Blogs Worth Following:

Wandering Quill - I've been writing steadily for over 8 years. I tend toward fantasy and science fiction, but I have dabbled in thriller, horror, and mainstream/literary fiction. And recently tried my hand at a bit of fantasy romance. I've been published twice, in poetry.

Stepping Into Fantasy - I started writing about the same time I learned how to read. Everything I'd "written" before that time consisted of squiggly lines and stick figures. Over the years, I thankfully improved in my abilities (though the stick figures do still make their occasional appearance). Right now, I'm working on several short stories and finishing up my latest novel, Aurumenas.

Jenn Lidster - I started writing (like a lot of people) way back in junior high. I finished two novellas as a teenager, then headed off to university to get a Bachelor of Arts in English Literature. After that, life and work got in the way of my creative writing, and it wasn't until recently that I made the decision to actively pursue my dream of publication. I'm determined to do it...and if there's one thing I've learned, determination is not to be underestimated.

Cursings and Musings - I'm a yet-to-be-published author. I have completed my first novel, "Fury", which is currently going through its fourth editing phase. I am working on other novels as well. I also dabble in poetry when the mood strikes me, though I prefer novels.

The Musings of a Looneywriter - I have scribbled poetry since age 13; in the margins of my class notes, on napkins at a diner, on receipt paper while I'm at work - the list goes on. I also adore writing short stories, mainly horror. In the past three years I've added novels to my repertoire. I don't believe in limiting myself to one genre, life's too short not to follow your passion.

TalkToYoUniverse - Analog SF author Juliette Wade's blog for lovers of science fiction and fantasy who want to talk to an expert about questions of language and culture (linguistics and anthropology): in the real world, in published fiction, or in worlds and universes of their own creation.

Wise Bread: Living Large on a Small Budget -
Jeff Yeager is the author of The Ultimate Cheapskate's Road Map to True Riches. He offers priceless advice on how to survive in today's economy.

Seven Great Authors Worth Reading:

Joe Haldeman - Science Fiction

David Drake - Science Fiction & Fantasy

Iain M. Banks - Science Fiction

Orson Scott Card - Science Fiction & Fantasy

Elmore Leonard - Crime Fiction

Kathy Reichs - Mystery

Judy Blume - Childrens/YA

Sunday, September 6, 2009

Another Look at Rejection

Writers and rejections go hand-in-hand. The reasons for rejection are not always black and white, though, which is why they can be so frustrating, especially when you don't receive feedback (i.e., a form rejection). This is why advice from experienced professionals can be golden.

Take a look at 7 Reasons Why Your Manuscript Got Rejected via InkyGirl. In my opinion, all of these things can be fixed on the writer's side of the equation. Either you need to work on your writing and/or storytelling skills, or you need to do more research on who would be the best fit for your manuscript.

Thanks to Janet Reid for providing the link in her blog. It will also be archived in the sidebar.

~Lydia

Friday, September 4, 2009

Book Review: Marsbound

Check out my first published review at The Book Book, Marsbound by Joe Haldeman. Let me know what you think. And if anyone else has read the book, I'd like to know your thoughts on it.

Have a great weekend!

~Lydia

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Movie Review: District 9

This is going to be brief. Real life (aka, not my internet world) is taking all my time this week, with a crazy work schedule (last week for that, though...more on that topic in a future post), and trying to get things in order before my son starts school next week.

Joe and I rarely get a chance to treat ourselves to a date of any kind, let alone, a night at the movies. Ticket prices are ridiculous. But for some movies, it's worth it. District 9 was worth it, in my opinion, although, not without its faults.

Pros:

~ Aliens
~ Explosions
~ Cool new weaponry
~ Creative story concepts
~ Emotional impact
~ Unique presentation and screen shots
~ A pig was used to take someone out. (Tell me that's not hilarious.)

Cons:

~ Plot holes like you wouldn't believe. At one point (near the beginning) I leaned over to Joe and said, "Um, this is retarded." I couldn't even think of a decent smackdown. That's how bad it was.

~ Important details left unexplained. Maybe this is the same thing as plot holes, but it was distracting enough to emphasize it again. I understand that not everything can be given screen time and substance. But...I would really like to know how such-and-such fluid is able to have a certain affect on humans by contact, and, at the same time, be used as a source of fuel for an alien ship. (Sorry for the vagueness, but I'd rather not give it away, in case you're considering watching the movie) This bothered me while watching the movie (it was a MAJOR aspect of the story)...and the irritation only chafed me more as I thought about it later.

~ Unnecessary rampant use of the F word. It was rather cute in the beginning, coming from this nerd sent out to evict the aliens. But by the final scene of the movie, I think that was the only word they were saying. Period. Now, I can handle my share of cuss words, especially in a movie with such bad-ass explosive combat as this one had, but still, there are limits. I wanted to scream, Say something more creative!

~ The ending was quite unsatisfactory. Not much more I can say about that without ruining it.

My favorite character? The alien kid. He seemed to have a better handle on things than anyone else in the movie. And there's a bit with him that laid out the entire philosophical aspect of the movie in just a couple of lines of dialogue. Despite my love of explosive action, I also like it when entertainment makes me think.

All that being said, we're probably going to rent this when it's released on DVD. Watching someone get completely obliterated, splattered like can of tomato soup in a split second, never gets old. (When you know it's not real, of course.)

~Lydia